Looking at payment network products/capabilities: MIT

Knowledge sharing

August 4, 2025

Looking at payment network products/capabilities: ๐Œ๐ž๐ซ๐œ๐ก๐š๐ง๐ญ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ข๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ญ๐ž๐ ๐“๐ซ๐š๐ง๐ฌ๐š๐œ๐ญ๐ข๐จ๐ง (๐Œ๐ˆ๐“)

An MIT is initiated by the merchant without the cardholder actively participating at the time of authorization.

It must be clearly linked to a prior CIT, or a valid agreement that ๐ž๐ฑ๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ข๐œ๐ข๐ญ๐ฅ๐ฒ allowed the merchant to store and reuse the payment credential.

Each payment network has introduced an MIT framework to improve data quality across the ecosystem and support issuer authorization decisions. In general, an MIT must:
โžก๏ธ be linked to an initial CIT
โžก๏ธ align with the cardholder consent terms specified in the agreement
โžก๏ธ comply with the regulations and authorization requirements set by the payment network.

Although MITs ๐š๐ซ๐ž ๐ง๐จ๐ญ ๐ ๐จ๐ฏ๐ž๐ซ๐ง๐ž๐ ๐›๐ฒ ๐„๐Œ๐•๐‚๐จ, most payment networks have implemented similar MIT indicators as part of their frameworks, covering the following transaction types:
โžก๏ธ ๐‘๐ž๐œ๐ฎ๐ซ๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐  (๐Ÿ๐ข๐ฑ๐ž๐ ๐š๐ฆ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ/๐Ÿ๐ข๐ฑ๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐ž๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ฒ): Scheduled payments for a fixed amount and interval (e.g., memberships).
โžก๏ธ ๐’๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐ข๐ง๐  ๐Ž๐ซ๐๐ž๐ซ (๐ฏ๐š๐ซ๐ข๐š๐›๐ฅ๐ž ๐š๐ฆ๐จ๐ฎ๐ง๐ญ/๐Ÿ๐ข๐ฑ๐ž๐ ๐Ÿ๐ซ๐ž๐ช๐ฎ๐ž๐ง๐œ๐ฒ): Regular payments with a variable amount (e.g., utility bills).
โžก๏ธ ๐ˆ๐ง๐ฌ๐ญ๐š๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ: A set number of payments as part of a purchase agreement (e.g., four equal payments for a TV).
โžก๏ธ ๐”๐ง๐ฌ๐œ๐ก๐ž๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ž๐ ๐‚๐ซ๐ž๐๐ž๐ง๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ฅ-๐จ๐ง-๐…๐ข๐ฅ๐ž: Ad-hoc charges triggered by specific events under a pre-existing agreement (e.g., mobile top-ups).
โžก๏ธ ๐๐š๐ซ๐ญ๐ข๐š๐ฅ ๐’๐ก๐ข๐ฉ๐ฆ๐ž๐ง๐ญ: Charges tied to the dispatch of goods in separate shipments.
โžก๏ธ ๐ƒ๐ž๐ฅ๐š๐ฒ๐ž๐ ๐‚๐ก๐š๐ซ๐ ๐ž: Charges added after the initial transaction, typically for incidentals (e.g., minibar charges).
โžก๏ธ ๐๐จ-๐’๐ก๐จ๐ฐ: Charges applied when a cardholder fails to cancel or appear for a guaranteed reservation.
โžก๏ธ ๐‘๐ž๐ฌ๐ฎ๐›๐ฆ๐ข๐ฌ๐ฌ๐ข๐จ๐ง: Retry of a previously declined authorization, where the decline reason allows a later attempt (e.g., insufficient funds).

๐๐จ๐ญ๐ž ๐ญ๐ก๐š๐ญ ๐ข๐ง ๐„๐ฎ๐ซ๐จ๐ฉ๐ž, ๐ฎ๐ง๐๐ž๐ซ ๐๐’๐ƒ2, subsequent Merchant-Initiated Transactions (MITs) are treated as out of scope for Strong Customer Authentication (SCA) if two key conditions are met:
โžก๏ธ The cardholder granted a mandate or agreement while โ€œin session,โ€ and SCA was applied at that time if the agreement was established through a remote channel typically during an initial authenticated CIT using 3-D Secure.
โžก๏ธ Each subsequent MIT is properly flagged in the authorization message as merchant-initiated, and linked back to the original transaction or mandate in accordance with payment network data requirements.

๐’๐ญ๐š๐ง๐๐š๐ซ๐๐ข๐ณ๐ข๐ง๐  ๐Œ๐ˆ๐“ ๐ซ๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ž๐ฌ and indicators across networks enables merchants to code MITs consistently and correctly, helps issuers reduce false declines, minimizes unnecessary SCA prompts for cardholders, and facilitates value-added services such as Account Updater programs that keep stored credentials (e.g., PANs) up to date.

No items found.
all our Thoughts & News

Curious to know more?

Contact us for a consultative talk
By clicking โ€œAccept Allโ€, you agree to the storing of cookies on your device to enhance site navigation, analyze site usage, and assist in our marketing efforts. View our Cookie Policy for more information.