Disputes are inherently complex due to hidden pre-dispute activity, terminology differences, and organizational overlaps. There are variable initiation and dispute flows, including TRRs, appeals, and arbitration. Diverse reason codes and rules add further complexity, spanning compliance, appeals, and rare codes. In addition, inconsistent documentation, timelines, exceptions, and fraud requirements complicate resolution.

‍

At Explicit Selection, we help our clients cut through these complexities and build unified, efficient dispute operations.

Our systematic approach to dispute unification applies a structured, proven method to transform fragmented systems into one cohesive strategy, including:

• Process analysis. Mapping dispute workflows from initiation to resolution
• Technical specification review. Analyzing file formats, data structures, and communication protocols
• Gap assessment. Evaluating each identified gap for severity, transformational complexity, and the cost of doing nothing
• Industry benchmarking. Ensuring our approach aligns with current best practices
• Strategic roadmap. Delivering prioritized milestones with realistic cost estimates

We pay explicit attention to participant rights and pre-dispute visibility gaps, harmonized and balanced reason codes, dynamic mid-dispute updates and withdrawals, and the trade-offs between streamlined and flexible processing.

‍

The tangible outcomes from our analysis are clear.

• Before, clients faced fragmented dispute systems with mismatched formats, workflows, and specifications, leading to unclear gaps, unknown costs, low visibility, slow fixes, and no unification path.
• After, they achieve full gap visibility, a prioritized roadmap with milestones, realistic costs, a solid business case, and a unified, faster, accurate, and scalable dispute operation.

If you’re seeking real clarity and a realistic next step in managing disputes, we’d be glad to partner with you.

‍